executive search Archives

Subscribe to the executive search RSS feed.

Aptitude versus experience | Which is more important in the hiring equation and when?

000002231405xsmall-scale1 One of the questions we as executive recruiters often get asked  is the trade-off between experience and aptitude.   Both sides of the equation are prone to asking it, clients and executive candidates alike.  Sometimes this teeter-totter is referred to as “domain expert versus best athlete.”

What do they mean when they ask?  There’s actually a lot of nuance in the question-when are skills and experience most important to success in the role versus pure talent and aptitude?

  • •    Just because a CEO is moving from one industry to another, does s/he lose his ability to successfully lead?
  • •    If a VP Sales has been successful at one stage of company growth, can s/he take that same sales toolbox and be successful in another stage company, say either emerging-stage or mature-stage?
  • •    Can a VP Engineering be equally effective managing in large companies and small?
  • •    Do companies look for the same types of leadership in good economic cycles as well as bad?
  • •    How does an executive’s move out of their wheelhouse of skills and experience impact their compensation and/or level in a new industry and company?

These questions are only a few of the factors that impact the answer.    The following discussion is aimed at trying to lend some clarity and context to question.

Let’s take a look at the hour-glass graph below to lay down some of these factors against our “expert or athlete” question:

Hour-glass graphic, aptitude versus experience

1)     Level of management: The first factor is where an employee sits in the organizational chart.   In general, skills and experience are most critical at the “waist” of the hour-glass graph-mid-to-upper level management, starting at manager, through director- and VP-level.  At the top and bottom of the hour-glass, aptitude often ends up as the greater emphasis in “hireability.”  This may be fairly intuitive for many.

a.     Entry-level: When you first get out of school, employers often hire for a combination of attitude and intelligence and look for those who exhibit room to grow or “headroom.”   In fact, at entry-level, skills and experience for those roles are often a liability.  Employers may feel someone is overqualified, or a “flight risk” if that employee finds another better-paying and/or higher level position at another company.

b.     CEO-level: When you achieve P&L/CEO status, employers often will place more emphasis on the track record a CEO has in leading a company versus a tenured career history in a specific industry area.  Can a CEO move from rust-belt manufacturer to biotech?  Likely not.  However, there isn’t the same granularity of fit applied at the CEO-level as at the middle-management layer.  If a CEO has been broadly successful in in a number of software companies, it often becomes less important what type of software, or what industry vertical that software was developed for.  Certainly some screening is applied to industry, with some of the below more general industry characteristics takingi precedence-

i.      Experience in selling to similar customer base, B2B vs. B2C or government

ii.      Experience raising equity capital from venture capital or private equity

iii.      Experience creating exits for investors that have generated good returns for those investors

iv.      Experience taking a company from one industry into other industries, popularly referred to as “crossing the chasm”

c.     Mid-to-upper management:   Mid and upper management are where skills and experience over mere aptitude are often most sought after by employers.  Those who are hiring at this level will often even emphasize industry skills and experience above managerial experience, giving the edge to a candidate with industry-relevant background and a lesser degree of leadership experience, assuming that management is a learned skill and can be taught or picked up on the job.  Is this right?  That’s not the focus of our discussion here.  Rather, our goal here is to describe corporate hiring  norms from our observations.

[click more button below for rest of post]

More…

CEO for growth-stage start-up in Denver focused on pixel OS

Our client is tearing down the walls of the pixel landscape.  The Company has developed proprietary breakthrough software that functions as a pixels operating system, moving video display from one source projecting one visual, to infinite sources projecting virtually unlimited visuals.  And all of this is at a pixel-density that can go beyond high-definition quality, at commodity projection device cost, with no manual calibration or image “stitching” required.  The Company’’s technology is used in various applications ranging from simulation and training to museum displays and digital signage.  The company serves corporate, government, and academic organizations.

pixel-os-show-and-tell

Market Opportunity

Industry Outlook (software-enabled displays):

  • •    Visual simulation and Large Venue Display – $1.4B and $22.2B
  • •    Growing rapidly – 14.1% and 23.3% CAGR
  • •    Incumbent companies expensive, inflexible, and manually aligned – the bottleneck to widespread use of advanced display
  • •    Commercial public venue display increased from $16.5B to $22.2B from 2005-2007
  • •    iSuppli (major research firm) predicts $51B by 2011
  • •    Multiple options for use: API for large, seamless displays and computing clusters with over 6xHD resolutions displays; or seamless displays up to 6xHD with no application integration.

A single Company server can calibrate multiple displays and is not limited by projection hardware type or resolution.

The Position

The CEO’s core responsibilities will include:

Marketing direction:

Marketing strategy & product marketing– Establishing a short and long-term business direction the drives the company to become an industry leader and maximize the penetration of the markets served.

Business development, including channel sales, OEM & relationships, and all distribution agreements

Operations– Product delivery, deployment, fulfillment and post-sales customer relationship management.

Manufacturing & Operations:

Oversight of manufacturing and production teams responsible for commercializing the technology, establishing build/buy/outsource decisions, etcetera. Working with the rest of the team, oversight of quality assurance, working with the CTO to ensure that product development meets various international multi-regional market-driven specifications and is “rolled out” smoothly and on schedule.

Staff- team building, development, mentorship:  The CEO is responsible for human capital planning and hiring.  As important, the position will actively be responsible for developing new and existing staff to help prepare them for company growth and increased leadership responsibilities at all levels.  Finally, the new CEO will serve as leader and mentor to the founding team and as a complement to their existing skills.

Investors/shareholders & board - milestone management, follow-on fundraising, liquidity strategy: The new CEO is primary liaison to the board and will aggressively manage milestone deliverables, be a key contributor at board meetings and to board/investor communications.  The CEO will be responsible for developing and managing against an annual operating plan and in addition to possible follow-on fundraising, will be accountable for optimizing the harvest for all shareholders.

Ideal Candidate Profile

The diagram below illustrates the intersection of competencies critical in the new CEO:

ceo-success-attributes-pixel-os

Compensation

Compensation is competitive with the position’s requirements.  In a performance-based environment, this will include base salary, milestone/incentive bonus structure, and a stakeholder position in the company.


Boston Search Group and IdealWave Combine to create BSG Team Ventures

Executive Recruiters Boston Search Group and IdealWave Solutions Merge to Form BSG Team Ventures

Bringing Unparalleled Mobility and Social Media Expertise IdealWave Deepens Firm’s Commitment to Building Trusted Advisor Relationships with Clients

BostonAugust 1, 2009 - BSG Team Ventures, formerly Boston Search Group, an international retained executive firm serving emerging and high-growth companies, today announced a merger with IdealWave Solutions, a nationally recognized executive recruitment leader in the mobility and convergence sector.  IdealWave couples deep expertise in the enterprise mobility and social media industries with a unique team-based approach that yields quick results with highly personalized service. The combined company, BSG Team Ventures, will be headquartered in Boston, with offices in Silicon Valley, New York and London.

As many other retained search firms are shrinking or closing down, BSG Team Ventures is taking advantage of the opportunity to grow stronger.  The merged entity will be uniquely positioned to identify and recruit top Board Director, C-level and VP-level talent for both emerging and established companies across its now seven practice specialties – mobility and convergence, cleantech, technology and media, medical devices, biotech, education, and not-for-profit.  While the executive search industry has been slow to harness advanced technology to optimize domain expertise, market involvement, and the candidate development process, BSG Team Ventures has turned to innovative social networking technologies to cultivate a large and growing community of mobile industry executives working for some of the most high-profile companies in the world.

“Combining forces to create BSG Team Ventures marks the beginning of an exciting adventure and a natural evolution for our business. With BSG we have found a partner whose commitment to innovation, client service, and results mirrors our own,” said Mathew Corbett, founder and managing director, IdealWave Solutions.  “I look forward to drawing on our combined 17 years experience in retained search and mobile industry expertise to grow the firm, provide increased capabilities to our clients, and expand into new markets.”

INmobile.org: Engaging the Global Mobile Community

The brainchild of Corbett, a longtime social media evangelist, INmobile.org is one of the largest industry-specific social networks on the Web, comprising more than 2,500 mobile industry executives who gather in one place to learn, share ideas, and network with peers.  Combining online networking with offline executive receptions at top mobile industry conferences, INmobile.org is both a key facilitator in helping BSG Team Ventures’ clients stay abreast of market and technology trends, and an invaluable tool in keeping BSG Team Ventures fully engaged with top leaders and decision makers globally.

The mobile industry is especially well poised for continued growth.  “Even more exciting than the internet phenomenon is this mobile phone phenomenon,” according to Dr. Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google, in a speech given to the Economic Club in 2008.

“Our merger with IdealWave comes at a pivotal time for our firm as we look to expand to new markets and set the highest bar for innovation in the executive search process,” said Clark Waterfall, founder and managing director, BSG Team Ventures.  “With decades of combined executive search and strategic organizational development experience, we’re confident that together with IdealWave we can continue to achieve the highest levels of client satisfaction in the industry.  We couldn’t be more thrilled with the addition of Matthew Corbett and Mark Newhall as partners to the firm.”

About BSG Team Ventures

BSG Team Ventures is an international leader in retained executive search and human capital consulting for emerging and high-growth companies. Its mission is to build deep, trusted-advisor relationships with its clients, and to do so with a keen appreciation for the unique requirements of entrepreneurial ventures.  Via its presence in Boston, New York, Silicon Valley and London, BSG Team Ventures has completed hundreds of leadership searches on behalf of its clients in its practice specialties that include technology, media, cleantech, biotech, medical devices, education and non-profit.

About IdealWave

IdealWave is the leading executive search partner for companies involved in or effected by mobility and convergence. Established in 2001 and headquartered in MA, IdealWave has worked with many of the most exciting companies innovating within mobility and convergence. The company was launched by Matthew Corbett and Mark Newhall.  For more information please visit www.idealwave.com.

Contacts:

BSG Team Ventures

Clark Waterfall: Managing Director cwaterfall@bsgtv.com

Matthew Corbett: Managing Director mcorbett@bsgtv.com

Address: 224 Clarendon Street, 4th floor, Boston, MA 02116

www.bsgtv.com

General Manager: eTrinsic Division

Untitled Document

Position: General Manager, Simbionix eLearning

Reports to: CEO, Simbionix USA

Location: Denver, CO

Website: www.simbionix.com

“Virtual reality simulation in surgical training has become more widely used and intensely investigated in an effort to develop safer, more efficient, measurable training processes…If executed properly, virtual reality offers inherent advantages over other training systems in creating a realistic surgical environment and facilitating measurement of surgeon performance.”E. Seymour and J.S. Rotnes, Surgical Endoscopy (2007)

“If we’re going to make a mistake, let’s make it on the simulators first.” - Dr. Karl Illig, Chief of Vascular Surgery at Strong Medical Center, Rochester, NY, on why physicians are eager to start using the new Simbionix PROcedure Studio simulator

“If the learning actually matters, use simulations. If it doesn’t, don’t worry about it.” - Clark Aldrich, founder of SimuLearn, industry visionary, and author of numerous articles and books on simulations and e-learning

SIMBIONIX IN THE NEWS

http://www.simbionix.com/News.html

http://www.simbionix.com/PROcedure.html

THE COMPANY

Surgical simulators have been developed in the past few years to enhance the training of physicians, reduce the number of animals and cadavers, and provide flexible training scenarios and preoperative planning. Despite their potential benefits, and the fact that they have precedence in flight simulators, there are very few simulators in current use globally. Simbionix as a leadership company in this growing industry is changing the medical training landscape.

As a world leader in the field of medical education and simulation technology, Simbionix offers the most comprehensive medical training experience available, using the latest software and hardware technology. The company’s state-of-the-art technology provides surgeons, interventionists, nurses, and technicians with a robust platform to learn and master critical skills to ensure procedural efficiency and promote quality patient outcomes. The systems offer a range of basic and highly advanced procedures, and incorporate detailed and complete metrics for skill assessment.

The user is free to practice skills and perform procedures until the required proficiency is attained. In addition, difficult and uncommon procedures may be practiced at any time. This maximizes consistency to optimize learning, providing a clear advantage over relying solely on previous ly available patient training methods. More…

Success Metrics for Newly Hired Executives

Below is the final tally on top metrics for measuring executive success in the C-level and VP level team CEOs bring on board to help them executive on their businesses.  Thanks to the CEO input of more than 60 poll responses to this latest venture-backed company CEO survey.

The question we framed was phrased as follows:

“In evaluating the success of an executive hire after 12 months, what would be the top 3 criteria that you would use?”

The first choice from the poll results is somewhat self-evident– that the executive has exceeded performance expectations (goals, milestones, objectives, etc.) for the specific role from the CEO’s perspective.

However, the second most popular metric was “established internal and external reputation as functional expert.”   Essentially, this means that the executive has built his or her own political/social capital with internal peers and external influencers, customers, vendors, or other external relationships key to the success of the company.

The third most important metric was “culture fit.”   This was selected over the other 4 remaining metrics offered by a more than 2 -to-1 margin.

The question that pops up is how a CEO might best measure the  #2 and #3 metrics.  For both of these metrics perhaps a 360-degree review at the end of 12 months would be beneficial.  There are tools offered by the likes of the Hay Group and others that do an online version of this contextual employee review that can be quite useful to determine an objective read (see http://www.haygroup.com/tl/Questionnaires_Workbooks/Emotional_Competency_Inventory.aspx ).

Perhaps it would also be interesting if an executive search firm who brought a candidate to an organization also made this part of their fee structure.  And facilitated the process/offered the tools to make it happen.  Food for thought.  The goal of the executive recruiter would be to serve as that often mythical “trusted adviser” of executive talent, facilitating as much objectivity around executive team-building and talent assessment as possible.

Worthy of note is the fact that “integrity” ranked near the bottom of the list of success criteria.  No doubt CEOs assume perhaps that this is a given in any candidate.

success-metrics-for-new-executive-hires-6-2009

New (and old) euphemisms for the term “layoff” for the 21st century

Layoffs, downsizings, “resource actions,” as IBM likes to call them, are painful for all of us. And both from an employer perspective and employee perspective.

There are those corporations who have no choice in an recessionary times. It’s a “live-to-fight-another-day” decision to do cut backs. It’s very similar to the classic ugly ethics dilemma of, “If the lifeboat can make it to shore ONLY if it contains 15 people, but there are 18 in it at the start…. What do you do?”

For the terminated executive or employee, it may make them feel stigmatized, inferior, inadequate. Even if these feelings don’t creep up, it absolutely changes their lifestyle, and often their life. If an executive has a family, a mortgage, car payments, tuition bills, it can become a a living tragedy and take years to recover from.

The part that many of us have trouble with is when a company depersonalizes the pain for all involved, or dehumanizes the damage that is done when some action is necessary. It seems at times that it’s a sort of corporate “pig Latin,” used as parents use pig Latin to keep the true meaning of something from their children.

We were asked recently by Boston public radio station WBUR to talk a bit about our exposure to traditional terms, reasons for new terms, and some guesses at potential future terms for the latest corporate penchant for staffing-related SlimFast dieting. Below is a quick redux. For the radiospot, go to http://bottomline.wbur.org/2009/01/0130podcast/.

Traditional terms:

  • layoff
  • cutback
  • belt tightening

In the category of “positive spin”:

  • rightsizing
  • rationalizing
  • early retirement
  • furloughing
  • staff rebalancing
  • top grading…. (popularized by Brad Smart, and most well known inside of GE, where they were known to get rid of the bottom 10% of performers annually …)

In the category of “make it sound better than working”…

  • forced vacation

In the dehumanizing “make it sound as if it’s a “no fault” action:

  • workforce reduction
  • RIF… (reduction in force)
  • downsizing

The UK is brilliant in coming up with creative euphemisms, whether perhaps because culturally the British often have a harder time with “directness,” or they just have a wonderful way with words….

Agricultural terms…

  • pruning
  • thinning out
  • “gardening leave” [again]

New suggestions in the depersonalization lexicon for the 21st century…

  • For those in the financial services industry
    • “Pre-bailout payroll adjustment…”
  • For the clothing/tailoring/fashion industry
    • “Employment alteration… “
  • For our weight conscious culture
    • “Personnel purge”
  • For our plastic surgery culture
    • Nip and tuck ["We did a..."]
  • For pharma/biotech:
    • “Draining the gene pool” [as in "my company was forced to drain...."]
  • For the green renewable energy movement
    • Crop management ["...we did some..."]
  • And, for all those of us who are part of the aging baby boomer generation, and are getting “rationalized” due to an active corporate strategy of replacing older more expensive talent with younger less pricey models, corporate America might use the term
    • “Boomer bounce,” as in “I was part of a boomer bounce”. Could be misconstrued for a new dance craze, or even the first signs of an economic recovery. Or, “trophy-employeed,” as a twist on the trend in America of those who find in their mid-life-crises that swapping out of a first wife or husband for a younger “trophy” wife or husband appears to be a good idea.

Finally, as there are rumors of yet another round of potential cut backs to come in the coming months, a 2nd shoe to fall so to speak, businesses and corporations of all sizes may no doubt bring new meaning to the term “spring cleaning.”

How are Retained Executive Search Firms Assessed?

How are retained executive search firms assessed?  And how should they be measured?

This is a funny question. And one that can be asked at two inflection points in the search process–

  • BEFORE picking a search firm

•    And AFTER a search has been executed/completed

Focusing on the “before” part for now, for most companies the 3 most popular decision factors used to help pick a winner in the “shoot-out” or “bake-off” process today are typically:

  • “Relevant Rolodex” or domain expertise. Has a search firm done a similar search in a similar sector recently?

•    Familiarity. Has a search firm worked with a client before?  The implicit assumption is “devil you know is better than the one you don’t.”
•    Price.  Depending upon economic conditions, search firms are as often as not considered “about the same,” and only price is the perceived differentiator.

However, I think there should be a shift in search firm selection criteria.

Let me digress for a moment and talk about the traditional value proposition of retained executive search.  Historically, there have been 4 pieces of value that the search firm delivers on:

1)    Finding or “hunting” the candidate.  In the industry, we refer to it as “candidate identification.”
2)    Selling the client opportunity to the “hunted” candidate
3)    Assessing the candidate for hard skills and soft skills “fit” for the search
4)    Closing the final candidate once s/he has been selected by the client company-the end game, including compensation negotiation etc.

Now, back to how search firms are selected.  The above criteria emphasize and value things like candidate identification.   At one point, this was a very important selection criterion to make sure the right search firm was picked for a search.  At one point in the history of executive search, headhunters would spend decades amassing a proprietary Rolodex, mapping the industry and what talent was harbored where.  This was hard-to-come-by information, usually only amassed via “gumshoe” work, calling and talking to the industry on a constant basis.  However, in the last 10 years, and 5 in particular, there has been a huge shift at the executive levels.  There has evolved a set of technology tools that has allowed unprecedented transparency into who is where at any given point, tech tools like ZoomInfo and LinkedIn to name just a few.  So, with access to these tools and the modicum level of investigative interest and time, finding as a value proposition for executive search selection has become commoditized.  The “black book” that recruiters worked hard to build and protect has effectively been published on the Internet for each and every executive level in virtually every industry.

So if “finding” is no longer the lynchpin for search firm selection, what does that leave? There are still the other three values a search firm brings-ability to sell the opportunity, assess the candidate, and ultimately procure the candidate of choice the company selects via the final interview processes and endgame negotiating.

It would be really interesting to see a search firm selection process be shifted to an evaluation of two of these three areas, plus an addition of three new metrics:

  • #1: How does a search firm “sell” the search to prospective candidates? What is the search firm’s “pitch,” how well does the executive recruiter present the opportunity, its nuances, and a compelling story. Good talent is usually not looking to move. And good talent is usually fairly happy where they are, and valued where they are. So, a good headhunter needs to present an even more compelling reason to persuade an executive to look at a new opportunity. A prospective client could ask the search firm for the marketing documents the executive recruiter has written and used from past searches and evaluate them as to their compelling nature. A client could even ask for samples of emails or voicemail “pitches” that have been used in the past, and what tools a search firm uses that uniquely differentiate a company’s executive need.
  • #2: How does a search firm “assess” candidates? We feel that assessment is the new “black book” value proposition of executive search. Prospective client companies could ask search firms for how they assess candidates? What tools do they use, what key success factors does the search firm interview for in all executives, and what unique success characteristics would they interview for specific to a given position and company profile. What assessment information is passed along to the company? What does a candidate interview summary “write up” look like? And how much assessment is really delivered in the write-up, versus a simple repackaging of resume and background information? Also, how are references done, and samples of references completed to get a sense for what the search firm is looking for in its referencing process. A really interesting article written about how search firms work, and in particular, how search firms assess candidates, can be found in the PhD research of Monica Hamori, PhD candidate at Wharton. It’s a very interesting read — http://www.allbusiness.com/specialty-businesses/332669-1.html. Unfortunately, Ms. Hamori’s conclusion is that candidate assessment is done very differently from search firm to search firm. Most notably, she identified that candidate assessment is done differently from partner to partner inside large search firms, with no assessment standards or processes.

As for the three new search firm selection criteria, I’d suggest clients add these three to the two above:
•    #3: Pre-search “discovery” process.  What does the search firm do to uncover all there is to know about the company, the culture, the position, the internal and exogenous factors, and most importantly, the chemistry success equation with the hiring authority within the company to whom the position with report.

  • #4: Post-search onboarding and “stick rate.” What does the search firm do to ensure success of the candidate in their new role? And what is a search firm’s “stick rate,” or success rate in placing executives in new companies who then stayed for some period of time rather than bouncing off, suffering organ rejection from the host organism company who hired them? This could even include a redistribution of the executive search fee structure. Wouldn’t it be far better alignment between client company and search firm if both were incented to nurture a new executive’s success in the role? Perhaps a deferment of part of the fee for service if onboarding coaching were employed, with a delayed “final payment” at the end of a year of service, on actual bonus paid “above targeted compensation,” rewarding the search firm for above expected performance achieved by that executive.
  • #5: References. Client companies should do a better job referencing the search firm. So much can be learned from how a search firm performs references. Who they check references with, how references are performed, what questions are asked, are references aggregated or attributed to specific reference givers, or? How many references are performed? Are any references performed with those who were not provided by the candidate? Are background and credentials checks performed on the finalist candidate(s)?
    Somehow, if these 5 selection criteria were used to evaluate potential search firms, my hunch is, as often as not, a different firm would be selected. And a better ultimate executive candidate for the retained search in question.